Scuttlebutt Website SCUTTLEBUTT
WEBSITE
ForumIndex FORUM
INDEX
Search Posts SEARCH
POSTS
Who's Online WHO'S
ONLINE
Log in LOG IN         

Forum Index : Discussion: Dock Talk:
Obstacles for US Olympic sailing
click for details

 

 


The Publisher
*****


Aug 27, 2008, 12:00 PM

Post #1 of 18 (2756 views)
Shortcut
Obstacles for US Olympic sailing Log-In to Post

Since the 1996 Olympics Games, the United States has led all countries in the total medal count for each of the four Games. Interestingly, it was also the 1996 Games when parity entered the sailing events, with the sailing medals being shared by a greater number of countries. The amount of time, energy, and money being invested in Olympic sailing has risen, and likely is now at a par with, many of the elite Olympic events. The US did not keep pace with this rise, and are now playing catch up. However, there are some unique aspects about the US and the sport within they may make this task more challenging.

Here are a few realities that we think are standing in the way of increasing the medal haul in the future:

1. The U.S. is connected to only Canada and Mexico, with the bulk of the strong sailing countries many time zones away. If sailors have to go overseas to train, the logistics and cost will always be an obstacle. Australia has overcome this obstacle, likely due in part with the sport’s high national standing.
Solution: North American countries need to work together to raise the overall level of talent, providing more value for cost effective domestic training. However, since there are very few competitive ranking regattas in the continent, overseas travel will still be needed.
2. Developing talent requires critical mass. The US has talent – some on the east coast and some on the west coast – with too much dirt in between. When the west coast sailors travel to the Miami Olympic Classes Regatta in January, they will have driven over two straight days to get there.
Solution: If we had a magic wand, all sailing in the US would be in southern Florida during the winter, and either California or the northeast US in the summer (or Honolulu, HI 24/7). For sailors to consistently gather and train, they need travel time, housing, and boats on both coasts. In short, they need money.

3. It is easier to develop top talent in classes that have good local mass. Of the 11 Olympic events in 2008, only the Star, Laser, and Laser Radial have decent fleet size and competition in the US (though the Finn did have 42 boats at the 2007 Trials).
Solution: Pray that ISAF picks events that are prevalent in the continent, and then work with builders and classes. This, however, is a huge task, particularly when Olympic events can possibly change for each cycle. The ultimate solution might be to focus on only those events where it is easier to develop top talent. This form of tough love was already in play for the 2008 team, where successful candidates were better funded than less successful ones.

4. Creating public interest in the Olympics is needed to excite aspiring athletes. An Olympic campaign consumes time and money, but if there is a genuine excitement about Olympic sailing, more prospects might be willing to take the plunge.
Solution: This is a sales job, and it cannot occur only during Olympic years. Athletes must constantly be telling their story. The media must be used in innovative ways, and we saw some of this amid the 2008 team. Olympic athletes must be part of special events both inside and out of the sport, and partner with high profile individuals outside of the sport. Take a celebrity sailing for a photo shoot, particularly one that looks sexy when wet. Seek celebrity status for the Olympic athlete.

5. The budget for sailing has increased, and needs to increase further.
Solution: Top results at prominent events helps. Creating public interest helps. Working on Items 2, 3, and 4 should all help with this mission.

6. The US has never had a plan to develop youth sailors for Olympic futures. The team has typically worked only with the cards it was dealt.
Solution: The US launched the US Elite Youth Development Sailing Team in 2007 to better support sailors that have demonstrated the ability and desire to be successful Olympic athletes. They are now making an annual commitment to this program.

7. US youth sailors are focusing on designated youth boats (such as the Club 420, FJ, Pixie, etc.), with the bulk of their racing done on short courses and sailed in boats with minimal tuning requirements. Great for learning boat-on-boat tactics, but not great for developing technical skills.
Solution: Other than the Laser/Radial, youth sailors need to get connected to prominent national one design dinghy classes that will teach tuning and big course racing (ie, Lightning, Thistle, Snipe, etc). In many dominant countries, youth sailors are able to compete in junior events in the Finn and International 470 and 420. Good news is the interest in the 29er (junior feeder for the 49er), and the success already on the international level. For boardsailing growth, since nearly every youth sailor begins in a form of pram, developing boardsailors is about getting them to convert early, and growing the fleets to insure there is enough quality racing.

8. Most top youth sailors progress to college racing. If a sailor competed in High School and then College, they will have completed 8 years of short course racing in boats that they did not own, that required very little tuning, and were not equipment sensitive. Those 8 years will have helped to develop some of the skills needed for a successful Olympic campaign, but have left a lot out too.
Solution: Start Olympic campaigns sooner. If an aspiring Olympic sailor goes to college, they need to use that time for the first quad, and make that the priority rather than college competition. While earning All-American or Sailor of the Year status in college is an impressive achievement, the time it took may not well serve the long term goal of Olympic success.


Some of the distractions in attracting top Olympic candidate are equal for all counties, such as professional sailing or non-sailing careers. Some of the obstacles in the US are beyond the leadership of US Olympic Team, and will require cultural shifts amongst youth sailing. Among the keys for the US is for the best sailors to be competing in the Olympics, not just the ones who are able to. Make Olympic sailing exciting and sexy, develop the necessary skills earlier, improve the level of play in North America, and of course, improve funding so that sailors without superior financial backing can take on the task.

Are there comments on this list, or any additional ideas? Reply to this thread.






KenVoss2
*

Aug 27, 2008, 7:21 PM

Post #2 of 18 (2666 views)
Shortcut
Re: [The Publisher] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

I don't think (4) is an issue. The top youth sailors know and want to do olympic events, no more publicity is necessary. But Olympics sailing, at the medal level, is basically a professional sport. Who can afford it?


charles heimler
*

Aug 27, 2008, 8:31 PM

Post #3 of 18 (2632 views)
Shortcut
Re: [The Publisher] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

Where to begin to continue building a successful US Olympic program?
I would suggest first looking at Zach Railey's success. About 3 years ago Zach came to Finn sailors with a dream to get out of Lasers and into Finns. He was immediately taken on by members of the USA Finn Asssociation, the Canadian Finn Association and Finn sailors in Europe. In his first regatta, he was loaned a state-of-art boat by a Finn sailor. The effort and success is his, but he has had a great amount of support from members of an established international class.
Second, have a look at the Royal Yaching Association's Olympic sailing program's website. It is much more transparent that US Sailing's. It even lists the amount of money allocated for Olympic sailing--it's the equivilent of over 44 million US dollars for 2005-2009. Money goes directly to fund sailors, but much of it is also spent on coaching and organizational infrastructure. The Brits are funded by their national lottery and national government. They also have a permanent training site at Weymouth at which their Olympic team and prospects spend many weeks each year.
A glance that the sports the Americans excell in will reveal that they utilize the best coaches whose track records are measurable and stand above all others.
Unfortunately, the days of American dominance in sailing (as well as in global economy) are probably over--resetting the ultimate goals of the USA Olympic effort may turn out to be other than attaining the most gold medals.


The Publisher
*****


Aug 27, 2008, 9:35 PM

Post #4 of 18 (2612 views)
Shortcut
Re: [KenVoss2] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post


In Reply To
I don't think (4) is an issue. The top youth sailors know and want to do olympic events, no more publicity is necessary. But Olympics sailing, at the medal level, is basically a professional sport. Who can afford it?


It is a committment, no doubt. An Olympic campaign postpones a lot of things that are part of normal life (job, family, etc). But it is also about following a dream, a challenge, an honor. To improve the funding is to help open the door wider for others to pursue, rather than to only those people who are able to pursue. Also, to start campaigns younger, so that two quads are completed by the mid twenties rather than the late twenties.


The Publisher
*****


Aug 27, 2008, 9:42 PM

Post #5 of 18 (2609 views)
Shortcut
Re: [charles heimler] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post


In Reply To
Where to begin to continue building a successful US Olympic program? I would suggest first looking at Zach Railey's success. About 3 years ago Zach came to Finn sailors with a dream to get out of Lasers and into Finns. He was immediately taken on by members of the USA Finn Asssociation, the Canadian Finn Association and Finn sailors in Europe. In his first regatta, he was loaned a state-of-art boat by a Finn sailor. The effort and success is his, but he has had a great amount of support from members of an established international class.

I also understand that when Zach began his campaign, the US gave him little funding (if any) because US sailors in the Finn event had not demonstrated sufficient success to warrant the investment. This past quad was about directing the funds to the best events, and hoping that would lead to success. With some success, the US was able to get more funding, and eventually spread the money out further and further. I doubt much support ever got to the boards; it would be interesting to see the final breakdown amongst the events - Craig Leweck, Scuttlebutt




msherman
***

Aug 28, 2008, 7:34 AM

Post #6 of 18 (2413 views)
Shortcut
Re: [KenVoss2] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post


In Reply To
...Olympics sailing, at the medal level, is basically a professional sport. Who can afford it?



It seems that the way for the US to get more medals is to make it more of a professional sport, but I am not sure the donations-route is ever going to do that. It needs a steady flow of funding rather than a continual "tin-cupping" approach.

That being said, it would be interesting to see the funding break-down by sailor (and relative results) to see how well we directed our funds.


505er
**

Aug 28, 2008, 7:52 AM

Post #7 of 18 (2407 views)
Shortcut
Re: [The Publisher] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

I have to laugh about the Finn. A few years ago my role as a class officer led me to participate in US Sailing for a year or two. I sat through committee meetings listen to people talk about how US Sailing should push ISAF to get rid of the Finn. Probably over an hour was spent on a complete not-reality-based discussion about how the Finn should go (the US was in a clear minority in wanting the Finn to go).. and the position was based on the US not believing we had a good chance of winning a medal. But this was one year into a four year Olympic cycle (not the current Olympic cycle), and I'm thinking who knows what will happen in three years.

So congratulations to Zach Railey on his sailing, his medal, and for doing in the Finn.

In my view, the key issue is that the US does not race the same classes the rest of the world does, and actually focuses on a different style of racing. Most of the rest of the sailing world has strong sailors racing international classes, these provide an excellent environment for developing skills. The strongest sailors from these classes try Olympic classes.

The US trains kids in Optis (a true International class), then puts them into Club 420s (US only, and very different from the International 420, which is a very wide-spread International class). Then at college, sailors race Club 420s or Club FJs (not International) without spinnakers or trapezes. The short course racing emphasizes starts, roll tacking and gybing and short course tactics, but not boat speed, or medium/long course tactics. Even the weight distribution between skipper and crew is different in a club 420 from an International 420 (you want some height and weight on the wire in an International 420). Then out of college, sailors can jump into a Vanguard 15 (US only, not International), or perhaps a J22 (which is International, but hardly preparation for Olympic dinghy classes).

The International Optimist class loves to point out how many medalists trained in Optis. Other international classes don't bother checking and creating these data, but it turns out that many of the medalists from other countries have solid time in tunable adjustable international classes before they go Olympic class. Just off the top of my head, the Danish team that won the first 49er gold medal, the British team than won the silver and Chris Nicholson (who had won all or nearly all 49er world championships up to the first Olympics with the 49er) had time in well known International classes. I'm sure with a little research we could determine that this was true of most medalists from other countries.

I suspect the reason the US has dumbed-down classes and racing that does not emphasize tuning, is that we have less free time, (our kids split their time between multiple sports and adult sailors have less discretionary time than they did 30 years ago), and favor classes where we can spend nearly all our time racing, not classes that require time to be spent on tuning and practice. Yes, I realize top college teams practice A LOT, but they are working on short course boathandling, not how to tune the boat.


The Publisher
*****


Aug 28, 2008, 8:52 AM

Post #8 of 18 (2377 views)
Shortcut
Re: [505er] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

I heartily agree with 505er's comments about the boat issue in the US. Not only does the youth track in the US seem to inadequately prepare top sailors for the Olympic level, those that stick only to that track are not creating relationships with types of boats that they may want to sail after college.

The Star will always be too cost prohibitive for youth sailing, and it may be a long time (if ever) that classes like the 470, 49er, Finn, and windsurfer are sailed in great numbers by youth in North America, but getting hooked into other similar classes to Olympic classes is a route that more need to travel on. Fortunately, the Laser and Laser Radial are being used in the Olympics, and these boats are exceedingly popular at all levels of the US youth track.

The challenge is in how Olympic events keep changing. Ideally, a sixteen year old would know what event he would like to compete in, and be able to begin a training plan that would carry him or her for at least two quads. Today, if that same youth had made a decision to pursue the catamaran event, that training plan would be trashed. Think about how gymnasts know what events to expect. If you were really good on the balance beam, after you had invested years into that event, but then that event got pulled in 2012, you would be pissed.


charles heimler
*

Aug 28, 2008, 9:05 AM

Post #9 of 18 (2367 views)
Shortcut
Re: [The Publisher] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

Craig--this forum thread is a great idea and I hope it can become part of US Sailing's thinking.
Finn sailors have gotten practically nothing from US Sailing in direct funding, and the reason given has always been that the USA Finn sailors have little chance to medal. They've made up from this by personal funds and fund raising, assistance from the class and its foundation, and in Ledbetter's case (last medal for Finns in 92, a silver), joining the Navy's performance sports team. For China, the sailors who did receive the bulk of US Sailing funding this quad did not medal.
One factor that contributed to Zach's success was the 42 boat open Olympic Trials held in October 97 in Newport Beach. He had some great Finn sailors beating him down and he managed the pressure and the conditions, which one could say helped prepare him for a similar situation in China. Duirng that event and through the Olympics, his full-time coach was Kenneth Andreasen, who is now replacing Gary Bodie as High Performance Director. Which brings me to my point--the Finn class has a working model for success in a world with little funding but plenty of committed sailors working toward other people's success.
The US Sailing Olympic effort is incredibly impoverished compared to other nations, and I think Brenner has done a good job with what he has to bring a vision to the program. I hope that part of his promised analysis of the program will include frank discussions with people from throughout the US Olympic sailing community. Specific budgets linked to performance, the amount spent on coaches and their results, and so on would be a great development. And we in the American sailing community need to have a real discussion about whether we want to financially support our Olympic sailing effort.
There are plenty of models around for success in sports. Take basketball for one. The team concept of the Redeem Team just builds on what is already known about sports success.
There are two principles that US Sailing OSC could adopt that might help--one is to base employment on performance--coaches, general managers, players in other sports know that if they don't deliver wins, they are not rehired.
The second is that Olympic sailing, like the NFL, has reached parity. How do teams in the NFL break out of parity? Usually the key is hiring exceptional coaches and administrators, whose reemployment is based on performance, and holding everyone accountable.


The Publisher
*****


Aug 28, 2008, 11:20 AM

Post #10 of 18 (2317 views)
Shortcut
Re: [The Publisher] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

From Bill Canfield, St Thomas:
If I am an average size hot shot college sailor at 5’ 10” tall and 165lbs with Olympic aspirations in 2012, I have real issues in looking for a boat. I am too small to skipper a Laser, Star or Finn (or crew). I am too big to be a 470 skipper and too short to crew. I seem to be limited to an expensive 49er with a fleet that is virtually inactive in 85% of the US.

Maybe this is where the problem lies?


Corky Aucreman
*

Aug 28, 2008, 2:38 PM

Post #11 of 18 (2280 views)
Shortcut
Re: [The Publisher] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

The challenges of geography, time and money are all very real. Most of these challenges could be mitigated if there were real public interest and recognition of the sport. One only has to compare the ink (mis)spent on baseball, football, golf and horse racing to the coverage of sailing to see where the problem lies. I think that there are those, even within the sailing community, who want it that way for economic and cultural reasons. The general public is not stupid. Many more would be interested if they were exposed on a regular basis to the true excitement and athleticism of sailing. Unfortunately, many, especially those in the sports media, love to perpetuate the image of sailing as an elitist, pointless, boring activity that no one can understand anyway. I think of Fred Rogan, local TV sportscaster, who "covered" the 84 Olympic sailing by wearing a pirate hat and making fun of the sport on the evening news.


George.Morris
**

Aug 28, 2008, 3:39 PM

Post #12 of 18 (2275 views)
Shortcut
Re: [Corky Aucreman] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

Yeah, Americans don't sail 49ers but they do sail Stars (of which there cannot be more than a dozen in the UK). Americans do sail Lasers and Laser Radials. Almost nobody sails the 470 in the UK or the Finn and I have never heard of a windsurfer race. So the Olympic sailors come up through different classes of which we in the UK seem to have far too many. Very few sailors in the UK will have ever seen a professional coach. There is a certain amount of amusement here at the fact that several of our medalists seem to have grown up in a declining coal mining area miles from the sea. Most UK sailors sail on inland gravel pits near disused coal mines. Your Anna Tunnicliffe was born in this area! That said, no one in the UK lives more than ten hours from the centre of gravity of our sailing world, and most live less than four hours away. You can get to the key events. We do have a national authority which decided some years ago to select, groom and coach Olympic hopefuls at an early stage and we have a government which has thrown a lot of National Lottery money at the sport. Every active sailor in the UK is either a member of the RYA or a member of a club which is affiliated to the RYA. It is not possible to race a sailboat without being one of those things. You don't seem to like your national authority very much - maybe the country is just too big and you don't feel close enough to the people who are trying to make things happen - but you do win the America's Cup more often than not!


The Publisher
*****


Aug 28, 2008, 6:20 PM

Post #13 of 18 (2258 views)
Shortcut
Re: [The Publisher] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

From R. C. Keefe:
Maybe we should go back to "Yachting" if we really want an Olympic presence. If so, television seems to be most important, and what we have now is never going to televise. How about something like a "Farr 40" or at least a true keel yacht with a real spinnaker and pole? And maybe the old Olympic Course should be brought back. It disappeared as there was much criticism of the two reaching legs. What happened? All we now seem to do is nothing but reach downwind. There seems to be little Olympic future for us on the water if we are going to continue to poor mouth funding by individuals - mostly yacht club members. Can money from yacht club members in this country really compete with programs funded by foreign governments? As John Wayne used to say, "Not hardly."


unconscious
*

Aug 29, 2008, 10:51 AM

Post #14 of 18 (2037 views)
Shortcut
Re: [The Publisher] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

If US Sailing is serious about developing the kind of high level system required for consistent success at the Olympics they should consider a format that already exists in developing exceptional athletes in several other sports. No need to re-invent the wheel here. Take a look at: http://www.imgacademies.com/home/default.sps
The facility on Florida's west coast is a great example. The kids live and train at the Bollitierri facility and have a choice of public or private schools to attend before practice each day. Olympic class boats and coaches would have to be provided but I suspect there'd be no lack of interest amongst developing sailors and their generally financially secure parents.


splash200
***

Sep 2, 2008, 7:24 AM

Post #15 of 18 (1606 views)
Shortcut
Re: [505er] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

The collegiate "system" seems to be the main avenue for a younger sailor's development in the US, and it has been noted that this is not appropriate for the Olympics.

What do other countries have for such a path? Is there an Intercollegiate Sailing Assoc. in other countries, like AUS, NZ, UK, Spain, etc?


tgdonlan
*

Sep 2, 2008, 10:50 AM

Post #16 of 18 (1599 views)
Shortcut
Re: [The Publisher] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post

One thing you missed at the very start: The justification.

Why is winning Olympic medals important? Why should athletes aspire to be professional medal-seekers? Why should charitable donors think that sponsoring athletes is the best use of their money? Why would US taxpayers or US Sailing dues-payers want their money used this way?

Once you answer these questions you can start talking about how to fund professional athletes effectively.

Tom Donlan


RC
***

Sep 3, 2008, 1:03 PM

Post #17 of 18 (1535 views)
Shortcut
Re: [tgdonlan] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post


In Reply To
One thing you missed at the very start: The justification.



Good point. The more I think about it, the more it seems that USSA puts waaay to much emphasis on the Olympics. That is the wrong approach because the top-down approach to developing great sailors is the wrong way to go. Better to built a healthy, bigger base from which Olympians spring, than to worry about medals at this point. The Olympics is so far removed from the grass roots of the sport, which is where we seem to be losing momentum but is critical to the health of our sport. The USSA annual report was basically a media promo of the Olympic sailing team, with almost no discussion on trends at the base of the sport. I would guess that a) USSA was banking on getting an "Olympic push" from a resurgent sailing medal count; and more dissappointing is that b) that USSA is really run by a lot of people who want to be "big fish in small ponds", such that the leaders actually want a smaller area of responsibility and interaction - grass roots sailing is not elite enough and too "messy" a concept for them to talk about at cocktail parties.

The biggest obstacle for US Olympic sailing is that the base of sailing isn't big enough.


The Publisher
*****


Sep 3, 2008, 7:50 PM

Post #18 of 18 (1519 views)
Shortcut
Re: [RC] Obstacles for US Olympic sailing [In reply to] Log-In to Post


In Reply To

In Reply To
One thing you missed at the very start: The justification.




The biggest obstacle for US Olympic sailing is that the base of sailing isn't big enough.



It is hard to believe the base of sailing isn't big enough when you look at the huge Opti fleets. I sense the problem is what the youth do after they age/size out of the Optis. Our youth doublehanded boats are dead ends... great for the teenage and college years, but offer zippo after that. When you get that college diploma, the bubble has burst. Team racing events has kept alot of post grads active because it extends the road... someone else owns the boats, they are non-tune intensive, and the racing is short course. I think the HS and College programs are great, but these programs need to allow for youth to sail in established one design classes too. For the small percentage that have dominated youth and HS sailing, and have the interest in the Olympics, that avenue needs to be hopped on ASAP to further the skills needed (ie, big courses, tuning and caring for boats, etc).


Viewing the Forums: No members and 43 guests
 
 


Search for (options) Contact Forum Forum FAQS Markup Tags Forum Rules